<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress vs. TypePad, Round 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html</link>
	<description>Michael Krotscheck's insights, ideas, and inspirations about web technology, life, and the kitchen sink.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-857</guid>
		<description>Hello Michael,

Like you I had Typepad and Wordpress simultaneously for awhile. I thought it would be good for me to have a foot in both camps. Finally I had enough of Typepad&#039;s wretched support. But I had a lot of material published and couldn&#039;t move keeping permalinks intact.

I offered programmers $200 for a clean transition. Couldn&#039;t get anyone to take me up on it. First we wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http://foliovision.com/2008/11/17/typepad-to-wordpress/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Typepad to Wordpress guide&lt;/a&gt;. People complained it was too intimidating and asked us to do it for them. Did that for awhile and finally built a &lt;a href=&quot;http://foliovision.com/services/typepad-to-wordpress/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Typepad to Wordpress conversion service&lt;/a&gt; to help people escape. I can&#039;t believe SixApart still doesn&#039;t have an exporter with permalinks.

I spoke with Anil Dash today at length about the export problem and he still won&#039;t fix it, even when I offered him our custom templates to install directly as Typepad&#039;s exporter. Not only that in the last three months, they&#039;ve stopped us from exporting 500 posts at a time. Now it&#039;s just 100 posts at a time. Lots of fun. Even with experience and expertise and dedication, the programming time on a single Typepad to Wordpress project is still seven to eleven hours. The first time we did it, it took 50 man hours.

Of course that&#039;s keeping comments, permalinks and images and site structure and everything intact. But still. It&#039;s way too hard. Anil told me about some Atom API converter but that converter just doesn&#039;t work and is disinformation.

So Julie, if you still would like to escape that terrible Typepad beta - I feel for you - check out our guide or our service. I&#039;ve been there and had to build a design and marketing company with my own programmers to escape SixApart&#039;s Typepad hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Michael,</p>
<p>Like you I had Typepad and Wordpress simultaneously for awhile. I thought it would be good for me to have a foot in both camps. Finally I had enough of Typepad&#8217;s wretched support. But I had a lot of material published and couldn&#8217;t move keeping permalinks intact.</p>
<p>I offered programmers $200 for a clean transition. Couldn&#8217;t get anyone to take me up on it. First we wrote a <a href="http://foliovision.com/2008/11/17/typepad-to-wordpress/" rel="nofollow">Typepad to Wordpress guide</a>. People complained it was too intimidating and asked us to do it for them. Did that for awhile and finally built a <a href="http://foliovision.com/services/typepad-to-wordpress/" rel="nofollow">Typepad to Wordpress conversion service</a> to help people escape. I can&#8217;t believe SixApart still doesn&#8217;t have an exporter with permalinks.</p>
<p>I spoke with Anil Dash today at length about the export problem and he still won&#8217;t fix it, even when I offered him our custom templates to install directly as Typepad&#8217;s exporter. Not only that in the last three months, they&#8217;ve stopped us from exporting 500 posts at a time. Now it&#8217;s just 100 posts at a time. Lots of fun. Even with experience and expertise and dedication, the programming time on a single Typepad to Wordpress project is still seven to eleven hours. The first time we did it, it took 50 man hours.</p>
<p>Of course that&#8217;s keeping comments, permalinks and images and site structure and everything intact. But still. It&#8217;s way too hard. Anil told me about some Atom API converter but that converter just doesn&#8217;t work and is disinformation.</p>
<p>So Julie, if you still would like to escape that terrible Typepad beta &#8211; I feel for you &#8211; check out our guide or our service. I&#8217;ve been there and had to build a design and marketing company with my own programmers to escape SixApart&#8217;s Typepad hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Schaefer</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Schaefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-816</guid>
		<description>Hello Mike - I have read your posts on the subject of WP versus Typepad and all of the comments, took me a while but fair is fair, you took the time to write your rebuttals and not knowing anything about TypePad if I was a judge and jury you presented the preponderance of evidence in favor of WP.. 

I am really more happy to know that my decision to build my little network of blogs, stores and websites using WP and PHP seems to be the correct one. Your opinion reinforced my decision to use WP over some other platform. I am not a developer, and not a particularly great writer but I do have interests, experience and opinions about a lot of things. I was told I could make money with blogs, IF i was patient and did the right things, IF I was willing to put in the time with relevant and interesting content, IF I was willing to learn new technology, etc. So I stopped throwing my money away in the stock market and started investing in myself via blogging for dollars.

As a complete amateur almost three years ago now I started my first blog, www.lowcarbmarine.com with the intention of creating interesting and informative blogs (as i could afford them) about marines (i was one), health and nutrition (i lost a bunch of weight on Atkins) golf &amp; travel (my job for the last 25 years). RVing is relatively new to me but I own a fifth-wheel travel trailer, crafts (i do mosaic so i can tell people I&#039;m artistic), pets, (i have the best dog i rescued from the pound, etc and at the same time make some money to supplement my income as I head into my 60&#039;s, via things like adsense, text link ads, Amazon and a few select affiliate relationships.

The theory being that one website alone is not going to make me a ton of money unless I have super-secret proprietary info to give away (I don&#039;t)  but maybe 100 sites making a few bucks a day will mount to something someday. I am trying to do this legitimately with keyword loaded, original content, video, regular updates with relevant content. Even my advertisers are relevant to my content. I knew it was going to take a lot of time and effort but nothing really worthwhile comes easy does it?  To date I have approximately 14 blogs, 39 landing pages, 2 Amazon stores, a link directory and a couple of other sites. I have used WP exclusively and really find it user friendly and easy to use. Of course I did not set it up on my server and handle the plug ins - my developer did that and I was happy to pay for it. The support alone was worth the money.

Once again, I am not a developer but have worked with one I have known a long time and who I worked with when I was involved in the Hospitality Industry in Scottsdale, Arizona. I would appreciate your comments about any of my blogs as I am about to undertake a new mission. I have semi-retired to a relatively small town in Arizona (20K) and the towns businesses depend on tourism for their survival - something I know a lot about.

There was a seminar here that i attended where a guy came in from out of town and presented to area businesses &quot;Blogging for your business made easy and affordable&quot;. Attendance was very good with businesses from landscapers to restaurants to hotels represented. But in about twenty minutes into his presentation I realized; I know more than this guy does! I was shocked and then as he got deeper into it with his free this and free that and how easy it is, blah, blah I started thinking wait a sec - he is just overwhelming these people with BS to sell his $600. &quot; I will build you a blog with TypePad kit. I wanted to get up and scream, hey people there is a better way and it&#039;s called Wordpress!

My developer and I decided a while back after I had moved and settled in that we would collaborate with a little consulting business that would assist business owners in this small town with website creation, updating, blogs, whatever. Since we both are very experienced in the tourism industry and with Wordpress as our platform we figured the best application would be to use WP as a content management system instead of the blog format. I wont bore you with the details but after hearing this Typepad guys pitch with his wild gestures and used car salesman approach I decided I had better find out more about TypePad and how to sell against it. I have registered a domain in the name of the town and plan on creating a business link directory using PHP. Your insight and defense of WP was very helpful, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mike &#8211; I have read your posts on the subject of WP versus Typepad and all of the comments, took me a while but fair is fair, you took the time to write your rebuttals and not knowing anything about TypePad if I was a judge and jury you presented the preponderance of evidence in favor of WP.. </p>
<p>I am really more happy to know that my decision to build my little network of blogs, stores and websites using WP and PHP seems to be the correct one. Your opinion reinforced my decision to use WP over some other platform. I am not a developer, and not a particularly great writer but I do have interests, experience and opinions about a lot of things. I was told I could make money with blogs, IF i was patient and did the right things, IF I was willing to put in the time with relevant and interesting content, IF I was willing to learn new technology, etc. So I stopped throwing my money away in the stock market and started investing in myself via blogging for dollars.</p>
<p>As a complete amateur almost three years ago now I started my first blog, <a href="http://www.lowcarbmarine.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lowcarbmarine.com</a> with the intention of creating interesting and informative blogs (as i could afford them) about marines (i was one), health and nutrition (i lost a bunch of weight on Atkins) golf &amp; travel (my job for the last 25 years). RVing is relatively new to me but I own a fifth-wheel travel trailer, crafts (i do mosaic so i can tell people I&#8217;m artistic), pets, (i have the best dog i rescued from the pound, etc and at the same time make some money to supplement my income as I head into my 60&#8217;s, via things like adsense, text link ads, Amazon and a few select affiliate relationships.</p>
<p>The theory being that one website alone is not going to make me a ton of money unless I have super-secret proprietary info to give away (I don&#8217;t)  but maybe 100 sites making a few bucks a day will mount to something someday. I am trying to do this legitimately with keyword loaded, original content, video, regular updates with relevant content. Even my advertisers are relevant to my content. I knew it was going to take a lot of time and effort but nothing really worthwhile comes easy does it?  To date I have approximately 14 blogs, 39 landing pages, 2 Amazon stores, a link directory and a couple of other sites. I have used WP exclusively and really find it user friendly and easy to use. Of course I did not set it up on my server and handle the plug ins &#8211; my developer did that and I was happy to pay for it. The support alone was worth the money.</p>
<p>Once again, I am not a developer but have worked with one I have known a long time and who I worked with when I was involved in the Hospitality Industry in Scottsdale, Arizona. I would appreciate your comments about any of my blogs as I am about to undertake a new mission. I have semi-retired to a relatively small town in Arizona (20K) and the towns businesses depend on tourism for their survival &#8211; something I know a lot about.</p>
<p>There was a seminar here that i attended where a guy came in from out of town and presented to area businesses &#8220;Blogging for your business made easy and affordable&#8221;. Attendance was very good with businesses from landscapers to restaurants to hotels represented. But in about twenty minutes into his presentation I realized; I know more than this guy does! I was shocked and then as he got deeper into it with his free this and free that and how easy it is, blah, blah I started thinking wait a sec &#8211; he is just overwhelming these people with BS to sell his $600. &#8221; I will build you a blog with TypePad kit. I wanted to get up and scream, hey people there is a better way and it&#8217;s called Wordpress!</p>
<p>My developer and I decided a while back after I had moved and settled in that we would collaborate with a little consulting business that would assist business owners in this small town with website creation, updating, blogs, whatever. Since we both are very experienced in the tourism industry and with Wordpress as our platform we figured the best application would be to use WP as a content management system instead of the blog format. I wont bore you with the details but after hearing this Typepad guys pitch with his wild gestures and used car salesman approach I decided I had better find out more about TypePad and how to sell against it. I have registered a domain in the name of the town and plan on creating a business link directory using PHP. Your insight and defense of WP was very helpful, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piano lessons</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>piano lessons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-772</guid>
		<description>Hi,
    These types of comparisons, not matter how “objective” they appear to be can never cover all of the factors that matter to people — it always comes back to a question of what suits any given individual at any given time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
    These types of comparisons, not matter how “objective” they appear to be can never cover all of the factors that matter to people — it always comes back to a question of what suits any given individual at any given time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Coming late to this discussion but I hope you&#039;ll see this comment and can respond: I&#039;ve recently divorced Blogger because it determined that my blog is spam, has locked me out and I can&#039;t reach a real person to fix the problem. So now I&#039;m hoping to give my business to either TypePad or WordPress. I appreciate the back and forth in this post, which is helping me to make my decision as I consider both platforms. However, what I need to know at this point is this: does either TypePad or WordPress have a history of automatically determining that a blog is spam, like Blogger did to me, and therefore locking a legitimate author out of her own blog? Thanks.

Leah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming late to this discussion but I hope you&#8217;ll see this comment and can respond: I&#8217;ve recently divorced Blogger because it determined that my blog is spam, has locked me out and I can&#8217;t reach a real person to fix the problem. So now I&#8217;m hoping to give my business to either TypePad or WordPress. I appreciate the back and forth in this post, which is helping me to make my decision as I consider both platforms. However, what I need to know at this point is this: does either TypePad or WordPress have a history of automatically determining that a blog is spam, like Blogger did to me, and therefore locking a legitimate author out of her own blog? Thanks.</p>
<p>Leah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.G.</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>B.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-262</guid>
		<description>You write,

&lt;i&gt;&quot;If you are catering to the type of blogger who wants to have ads on their site, then you’re catering to people less interested in providing content and more interested in earning a quick buck. That’s certainly an acceptable business strategy, but not one I would lower myself to.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I know you&#039;ve got some cheerleaders for sticking it to someone perceived as The Man, but as a constructive suggestion I&#039;d really take a deep breath before you hit that submit button and take a look not only at your tone, but at the unfounded assumptions you may be making about huge swaths of people whose work you do not know. You don&#039;t value the ability to host ads on a blog. Great. You could have simply made that point graciously. As it is, you sounded like a sanctimonious little twit.

First, if you&#039;re making some kind of moral statement about ads... the same folks who provide the non-ad-friendly Wordpress.com are also behind the VERY ad-friendly self-hosted Wordpress. So much for the moral superiority of Automattic and their developer community. While they have specific reasons for forbidding ads on Wordpress.com-hosted blogs, they are just as happy to &quot;cater to the type of blogger&quot; at which you are pursing your lips like the Church Lady.

Let&#039;s go over it in detail:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;If you are catering to the type of blogger who wants to have ads on their site...&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

There is no such thing as &quot;the&quot; type of blogger who is ad-supported. There&#039;s an infinite range from total spammers to authors advertising their own books to piano teachers putting up links to the sheet music they assign (how DARE they get 8% from Sheet Music Plus!) to ordinary bloggers with a few adsense units to defray hosting, to corporate blogs to put a face on a company and product, to widely read blogs that run &quot;real&quot; advertising from major companies eager to get in front of their highly qualified audience.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Then you’re catering to people less interested in providing content and more interested in earning a quick buck.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

How so? Many bloggers are primarily passionate about a subject and want to earn a few bucks if they can. Other bloggers ARE primarily interested in earning a buck because they view blogging as a JOB. But who cares, as long as the content is good? When I go to work for some company, I am indeed more interested in earning a buck than I am in the company&#039;s agenda. However, I have agreed to perform at a high level of professionalism in exchange for said buck. If I fail to meet expectations, I&#039;ll be gone. If a blogger fails to provide content people want, same deal.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;That’s certainly an acceptable business strategy, but not one I would lower myself to.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I assume you work for a living. So do many bloggers and other people who provide all sorts of content. If it&#039;s &quot;lowering yourself&quot; to earn money providing content, then all your favorite writers, entertainers, journalists -- and (gasp!) probably some of your favorite bloggers -- are &quot;lowering themselves&quot; in a cynical attempt to put food on the table for their families. 

Or do you think blogging is different, somehow above it all? Please explain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You write,</p>
<p><i>&#8220;If you are catering to the type of blogger who wants to have ads on their site, then you’re catering to people less interested in providing content and more interested in earning a quick buck. That’s certainly an acceptable business strategy, but not one I would lower myself to.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I know you&#8217;ve got some cheerleaders for sticking it to someone perceived as The Man, but as a constructive suggestion I&#8217;d really take a deep breath before you hit that submit button and take a look not only at your tone, but at the unfounded assumptions you may be making about huge swaths of people whose work you do not know. You don&#8217;t value the ability to host ads on a blog. Great. You could have simply made that point graciously. As it is, you sounded like a sanctimonious little twit.</p>
<p>First, if you&#8217;re making some kind of moral statement about ads&#8230; the same folks who provide the non-ad-friendly Wordpress.com are also behind the VERY ad-friendly self-hosted Wordpress. So much for the moral superiority of Automattic and their developer community. While they have specific reasons for forbidding ads on Wordpress.com-hosted blogs, they are just as happy to &#8220;cater to the type of blogger&#8221; at which you are pursing your lips like the Church Lady.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go over it in detail:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;If you are catering to the type of blogger who wants to have ads on their site&#8230;&#8221;</i></p>
<p>There is no such thing as &#8220;the&#8221; type of blogger who is ad-supported. There&#8217;s an infinite range from total spammers to authors advertising their own books to piano teachers putting up links to the sheet music they assign (how DARE they get 8% from Sheet Music Plus!) to ordinary bloggers with a few adsense units to defray hosting, to corporate blogs to put a face on a company and product, to widely read blogs that run &#8220;real&#8221; advertising from major companies eager to get in front of their highly qualified audience.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Then you’re catering to people less interested in providing content and more interested in earning a quick buck.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>How so? Many bloggers are primarily passionate about a subject and want to earn a few bucks if they can. Other bloggers ARE primarily interested in earning a buck because they view blogging as a JOB. But who cares, as long as the content is good? When I go to work for some company, I am indeed more interested in earning a buck than I am in the company&#8217;s agenda. However, I have agreed to perform at a high level of professionalism in exchange for said buck. If I fail to meet expectations, I&#8217;ll be gone. If a blogger fails to provide content people want, same deal.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;That’s certainly an acceptable business strategy, but not one I would lower myself to.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I assume you work for a living. So do many bloggers and other people who provide all sorts of content. If it&#8217;s &#8220;lowering yourself&#8221; to earn money providing content, then all your favorite writers, entertainers, journalists &#8212; and (gasp!) probably some of your favorite bloggers &#8212; are &#8220;lowering themselves&#8221; in a cynical attempt to put food on the table for their families. </p>
<p>Or do you think blogging is different, somehow above it all? Please explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Typepad has undergone a radical change the last year, pushing out new features that at least for me have caused tons of problems. I volunteered to beta test their new Compose Editor. When it created problems beyond just composing posts, I asked to be removed, and was told I was stuck. Now that the Compose Editor is out of beta, I am still in some sort of beta account, with a loss of functionality throughout my account. I&#039;ve been told their help documentation does not apply to my beta account, yet submitting help tickets -- which used to be responded to within hours when I had a basic account -- often does not resolve a problem and can take days to get an answer, even though I supposedly have &quot;priority&quot; status having upgraded my account. I cannot get an answer as to how long I&#039;ll be in limbo.

This is not how to keep or gain customers. I don&#039;t want a &quot;fully loaded&quot; fancy car if the damn thing can&#039;t get me from point A to point B, and that&#039;s how Typepad feels right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typepad has undergone a radical change the last year, pushing out new features that at least for me have caused tons of problems. I volunteered to beta test their new Compose Editor. When it created problems beyond just composing posts, I asked to be removed, and was told I was stuck. Now that the Compose Editor is out of beta, I am still in some sort of beta account, with a loss of functionality throughout my account. I&#8217;ve been told their help documentation does not apply to my beta account, yet submitting help tickets &#8212; which used to be responded to within hours when I had a basic account &#8212; often does not resolve a problem and can take days to get an answer, even though I supposedly have &#8220;priority&#8221; status having upgraded my account. I cannot get an answer as to how long I&#8217;ll be in limbo.</p>
<p>This is not how to keep or gain customers. I don&#8217;t want a &#8220;fully loaded&#8221; fancy car if the damn thing can&#8217;t get me from point A to point B, and that&#8217;s how Typepad feels right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 03:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-253</guid>
		<description>After you&#039;ve comprehensively proven your case here, can you move on to which is better, Mac or PC next?

These types of comparisons, not matter how &quot;objective&quot; they appear to be can never cover all of the factors that matter to people -- it always comes back to a question of what suits any given individual at any given time.

As for the &quot;Typepad/MT sucks because it&#039;s too hard to theme&quot; type of comment, you could also argue that WP theming sucks because there is too much PHP mixed into the tags. Both can be said to be accurate, but both are clearly open to argument.

And for the record, I think both platforms are OK, and don&#039;t have a problem with either and would (and have) recommended both to different people at different times and in different circumstances. It always come back to choosing the right tool for the job at hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After you&#8217;ve comprehensively proven your case here, can you move on to which is better, Mac or PC next?</p>
<p>These types of comparisons, not matter how &#8220;objective&#8221; they appear to be can never cover all of the factors that matter to people &#8212; it always comes back to a question of what suits any given individual at any given time.</p>
<p>As for the &#8220;Typepad/MT sucks because it&#8217;s too hard to theme&#8221; type of comment, you could also argue that WP theming sucks because there is too much PHP mixed into the tags. Both can be said to be accurate, but both are clearly open to argument.</p>
<p>And for the record, I think both platforms are OK, and don&#8217;t have a problem with either and would (and have) recommended both to different people at different times and in different circumstances. It always come back to choosing the right tool for the job at hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Beautiful! This is blogging man. I loved reading yours and Anil&#039;s back and forth, and you really did your research. Great work, keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful! This is blogging man. I loved reading yours and Anil&#8217;s back and forth, and you really did your research. Great work, keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Way</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-221</guid>
		<description>This seems to be the most important point. Anyone care to explain further? If both sets of URLs are indexed by Google, isn&#039;t that duplicate content?

Quote:

You neglect to point out the following link: http://celebritybabies.typepad.com/, and all the subsequently valid links that can be searched for on google. If you want to talk SEO, lets talk about the penalties of double-posted content.

To contrast on WordPress.com, lets take a look at People Magazine. The original stylewatch wordpress account link redirects to the correct URL, and even if you search at the stylewatch.wordpress.com site the links all 301 redirect to the correct server.

Example:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;sa=G&amp;q=site:celebritybabies.typepad.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to be the most important point. Anyone care to explain further? If both sets of URLs are indexed by Google, isn&#8217;t that duplicate content?</p>
<p>Quote:</p>
<p>You neglect to point out the following link: <a href="http://celebritybabies.typepad.com/" rel="nofollow">http://celebritybabies.typepad.com/</a>, and all the subsequently valid links that can be searched for on google. If you want to talk SEO, lets talk about the penalties of double-posted content.</p>
<p>To contrast on WordPress.com, lets take a look at People Magazine. The original stylewatch wordpress account link redirects to the correct URL, and even if you search at the stylewatch.wordpress.com site the links all 301 redirect to the correct server.</p>
<p>Example:<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;sa=G&amp;q=site:celebritybabies.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;sa=G&amp;q=site:celebritybabies.typepad.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claverhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Claverhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-214</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&#039;“And MT is dramatically more secure than WordPress.org — and that’s according to the Department of Homeland Security’s own statistics.”&#039;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;em&gt;&#039;You are using misleading statistics in the post you linked. The aggregate data provided by the Department of Homeland Security covers every version of each system and every third party plugin across the better part of a decade, without even taking into account reported vs. actual, fix turnaround, whether it’s third party or core, and the size of the reporting community.&#039;&lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;d like to imagine that a Department of Homeland Security would be concentrating powers upon clear and present danger and not on the comparative insecurities of blogging software   ---   they should turn their collective attentions to how many CEOs can dance on the point of a needle if they have that much time on their hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>&#8216;“And MT is dramatically more secure than WordPress.org — and that’s according to the Department of Homeland Security’s own statistics.”&#8217;</em></strong></p>
<p><em>&#8216;You are using misleading statistics in the post you linked. The aggregate data provided by the Department of Homeland Security covers every version of each system and every third party plugin across the better part of a decade, without even taking into account reported vs. actual, fix turnaround, whether it’s third party or core, and the size of the reporting community.&#8217;</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to imagine that a Department of Homeland Security would be concentrating powers upon clear and present danger and not on the comparative insecurities of blogging software   &#8212;   they should turn their collective attentions to how many CEOs can dance on the point of a needle if they have that much time on their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eligio</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Eligio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-212</guid>
		<description>totally aggree with you, theming is pain in the ass</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>totally aggree with you, theming is pain in the ass</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amolpatil2k</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>amolpatil2k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-211</guid>
		<description>I have made a suggestion regarding blog flavors including search engine flavor over at wordpress.org ideas. Click here to check it out: http://wordpress.org/extend/ideas/topic.php?id=1574</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have made a suggestion regarding blog flavors including search engine flavor over at wordpress.org ideas. Click here to check it out: <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/ideas/topic.php?id=1574" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/ideas/topic.php?id=1574</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Not a single mention of whether TypePad is powered by in-shop MT. Ding Ding.
I&#039;ve used MT before, and I found it to be a pain to theme, use, and it took forever to do the &#039;publishing&#039; posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a single mention of whether TypePad is powered by in-shop MT. Ding Ding.<br />
I&#8217;ve used MT before, and I found it to be a pain to theme, use, and it took forever to do the &#8216;publishing&#8217; posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amolpatil2k</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>amolpatil2k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Love the design especially the chestnuts and comment nesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the design especially the chestnuts and comment nesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-185</guid>
		<description>To an extent, I see his point about &quot;people who aren&#039;t PHP coders&quot;, but only to an extent.

All WordPress themes are, basically, PHP code. Customizing your site and it&#039;s look requires theme editing, which invariably means editing that PHP code. While this is not difficult, it&#039;s sometimes hard to convince people of that. From my experience as a moderator on the WordPress support forums, I can say that some people simply won&#039;t do it under any circumstances. They have this notion that it&#039;s beyond them, even when it is probably not. 

But then again, these same people would have issues with a simple templating system as well. The problem is not that they think they can&#039;t code, it&#039;s that actual text scares them in some fundamental way. If it&#039;s not about dragging things around in a GUI, then they can&#039;t bring themselves to do it. This is where we get things like widgets to make this sort of thing simpler.

And in the long run, themes like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plaintxt.org/themes/sandbox/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sandbox&lt;/a&gt; and similar are slowly making theme editing via PHP/Templates almost unnecessary. Sandbox can be wholly customized with mere CSS editing, is good with SEO, and highly semantically flexible. New versions of WordPress support &quot;CSS Themes&quot; like this, where the theme remains the same and only the CSS changes. More support for this sort of thing is planned in the future. So his point about editing PHP files might not be the case sooner rather than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To an extent, I see his point about &#8220;people who aren&#8217;t PHP coders&#8221;, but only to an extent.</p>
<p>All WordPress themes are, basically, PHP code. Customizing your site and it&#8217;s look requires theme editing, which invariably means editing that PHP code. While this is not difficult, it&#8217;s sometimes hard to convince people of that. From my experience as a moderator on the WordPress support forums, I can say that some people simply won&#8217;t do it under any circumstances. They have this notion that it&#8217;s beyond them, even when it is probably not. </p>
<p>But then again, these same people would have issues with a simple templating system as well. The problem is not that they think they can&#8217;t code, it&#8217;s that actual text scares them in some fundamental way. If it&#8217;s not about dragging things around in a GUI, then they can&#8217;t bring themselves to do it. This is where we get things like widgets to make this sort of thing simpler.</p>
<p>And in the long run, themes like <a href="http://www.plaintxt.org/themes/sandbox/" rel="nofollow">Sandbox</a> and similar are slowly making theme editing via PHP/Templates almost unnecessary. Sandbox can be wholly customized with mere CSS editing, is good with SEO, and highly semantically flexible. New versions of WordPress support &#8220;CSS Themes&#8221; like this, where the theme remains the same and only the CSS changes. More support for this sort of thing is planned in the future. So his point about editing PHP files might not be the case sooner rather than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinatra</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinatra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Michael :
I agree with you on this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael :<br />
I agree with you on this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Su</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Su</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-177</guid>
		<description>To cherry-pick a few of the easier points, given the length here makes a real discussion near-impossible:

&lt;i&gt;Are you powering typepad.com with the openly available version of Movable Type? Because WordPress.com is powered by MU&lt;/i&gt;
1&gt; No, they aren&#039;t. Typepad is, and has been for some time now, a different application. The dog food argument is invalid given that the equivalent MT functionality didn&#039;t even exist then.
2&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://wank.wordpress.com/2008/06/16/did-akismet-break-or-something/#comment-85810&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wordpress.com doesn&#039;t run on the openly available WPMU&lt;/a&gt;, either. (See end.)

I&#039;m sorry, but the raw number of plugins each platform has is absolutely irrelevant. It has been repeatedly pointed out that part of the reason for this difference is that &lt;strong&gt;both&lt;/strong&gt; applications do things in the core code that the other does not. The MT templating language has been evolving for some time now to &lt;em&gt;reduce&lt;/em&gt; the need for plugins to accomplish many tasks. 
Now, if you want to focus on &lt;em&gt;specific&lt;/em&gt; plugins as deficiencies, feel free.
As a sidenote, the MT plugin directory is not remotely comprehensive, and I have the personal library to prove it.

&lt;i&gt;I’d like to point out that you just went on record to say that there’s no difference between the Free Download and the “Movable Type Professional Pack” advertised at $100, which… lets see…”is an add-on for Movable Type 4.1 available exclusively to paid customers”
[...]
As soon as you want to make money off of it (as you pointed out above) or &quot;support some kind of commercial endeavor&quot;, it’ll cost you. [from your comment on prior post]&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, no, you&#039;re putting words in his mouth based upon your own lack of understanding of the licensing. The core MT application, under the MTOS license is free for any use. This is where your comparison ends, as WP has no equivalent of a commercial add-on like the ProPack, or official support(as far as I&#039;m aware). The ProPack does switch over to a personal/commercial usage split, but that is not a requirement of the core software. 
I&#039;ve given up on trying to understand why the licensing is confusing to people; I have no problem with it, but many others clearly do so something does appear to be wrong but I have on idea what.

(Note that I&#039;m probably even more aware[&lt;em&gt;and more accurately&lt;/em&gt;] of the problems MT has than you are and am &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; denying them. But I&#039;m also not in a position to defend WP, seeing as I don&#039;t use it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To cherry-pick a few of the easier points, given the length here makes a real discussion near-impossible:</p>
<p><i>Are you powering typepad.com with the openly available version of Movable Type? Because WordPress.com is powered by MU</i><br />
1&gt; No, they aren&#8217;t. Typepad is, and has been for some time now, a different application. The dog food argument is invalid given that the equivalent MT functionality didn&#8217;t even exist then.<br />
2&gt; <a href="http://wank.wordpress.com/2008/06/16/did-akismet-break-or-something/#comment-85810" rel="nofollow">Wordpress.com doesn&#8217;t run on the openly available WPMU</a>, either. (See end.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but the raw number of plugins each platform has is absolutely irrelevant. It has been repeatedly pointed out that part of the reason for this difference is that <strong>both</strong> applications do things in the core code that the other does not. The MT templating language has been evolving for some time now to <em>reduce</em> the need for plugins to accomplish many tasks.<br />
Now, if you want to focus on <em>specific</em> plugins as deficiencies, feel free.<br />
As a sidenote, the MT plugin directory is not remotely comprehensive, and I have the personal library to prove it.</p>
<p><i>I’d like to point out that you just went on record to say that there’s no difference between the Free Download and the “Movable Type Professional Pack” advertised at $100, which… lets see…”is an add-on for Movable Type 4.1 available exclusively to paid customers”<br />
[...]<br />
As soon as you want to make money off of it (as you pointed out above) or &#8220;support some kind of commercial endeavor&#8221;, it’ll cost you. [from your comment on prior post]</i></p>
<p>Actually, no, you&#8217;re putting words in his mouth based upon your own lack of understanding of the licensing. The core MT application, under the MTOS license is free for any use. This is where your comparison ends, as WP has no equivalent of a commercial add-on like the ProPack, or official support(as far as I&#8217;m aware). The ProPack does switch over to a personal/commercial usage split, but that is not a requirement of the core software.<br />
I&#8217;ve given up on trying to understand why the licensing is confusing to people; I have no problem with it, but many others clearly do so something does appear to be wrong but I have on idea what.</p>
<p>(Note that I&#8217;m probably even more aware[<em>and more accurately</em>] of the problems MT has than you are and am <b>not</b> denying them. But I&#8217;m also not in a position to defend WP, seeing as I don&#8217;t use it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozh</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-176</guid>
		<description>There won&#039;t be any reply from SixApart on this post (or on &lt;a&gt;Lloyd&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s) because there&#039;s nothing to be added I think :)

(except maybe how painful it is to install MT for the first time, when it&#039;s just piece of cake for a newbie to install WP)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There won&#8217;t be any reply from SixApart on this post (or on <a>Lloyd</a>&#8217;s) because there&#8217;s nothing to be added I think <img src='http://www.krotscheck.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(except maybe how painful it is to install MT for the first time, when it&#8217;s just piece of cake for a newbie to install WP)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zii:-</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Zii:-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Thank Zii:-For the Great topic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank Zii:-For the Great topic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zii:-</title>
		<link>http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Zii:-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krotscheck.net/2008/06/14/wordpress-vs-typepad-round-2.html#comment-173</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Andrea 100% !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Andrea 100% !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
